Kentucky Fried Chicken Essay

Looking at the graph supra we washstand see that Yum Brands, the p arnts company of KFC argon the trine biggest firm in the fast food industry. By serving more than than 12 million customers in 21000 stores in 109 countries e in reality day, KFC has become the cosmea intimately popular jaundiced fast food franchise. (1) However, over the ag adept decade, KFCs suppliers countenance been caught several time violating animal rights by PETA (People for the good Treatment of Animals), the worlds largest animal rights organization. KFC claims that all their suppliers argon very well monitored and often inspected by the government however PETA undercover investigations d sore proved sepa accountwise. In 2007, 2 videos secretly recorded workers extremely break animal rights in these slaughterhouses, showing some disturbing scenes. Although you may urge that KFC does not office for the cruelty in the slaughterhouses, it has give outs its own canon of conduct, which give be discussed later in this report.Besides, since KFC buys raw meat from these suppliers, they argon partly support these slaughterhouses so it is as well as a part of their responsibility. The main occasion of this report is to show several violations which were caught by PETA investigation in 2007 and the assertable solutions for this particular scandal. The investigation takes place in Tysons Georgia and Tennessee factories, one of KFCs major suppliers. Within only 9 days of the investigation, some workers engage been caught on videos abusing chickens. One of the approximately severe acts is workers urinating in the belts that metamorphose birds to different areas in the slaughterhouse (2). And that is not the only thing they did. Chickens are thrown from a far distance to the conveyor belt. The workers at these slaughterhouses someways found it an entertaining thing to do so the yell was perennial once once more and again. They picked up chickens and throw them to the s hackles.Chickens are also found stagnant after trapping their body parts under a admittance at the end of the belt meaning the facility quality is not good enough. One of the examples is the steel which is supposed to cut chickens throat, cut the chickens body parts instead, and many of them also miss the blade. Therefore, when being transferred to the next stage of the production, which is going to the boiling tank, they are amply conscious. Moreover, workers are told by supervisors that it is acceptable to rip off thoselive chickens heads which are not cut properly. The problem here is, supervisors at both these slaughterhouses were involved with the abuse and aware of it but did not do anything to stop it from happening. Moreover, or so of KFC claims on their website are inaccu assess and go against their code of conduct (3) Our suppliers work with primary breeders who provide poultry specifically selected with wellness and well being in mind.This statement is, however, fals e. The United States Department of husbandry (USDA) discovered that KFCs suppliers use drugs to help chickens to gain as untold weight as manageable in a short full stop of time. The effect of this is these chickens will suffer from diseases and injuries such(prenominal) as broken legs, disembodied spirit attacks and other problems because they are overgrown.(4) Prior to slaughter, birds are stunned so they are insensible to pain. Chickens are stunned and killed before they are introduced into the defeathering tanks.This statement is again not totally true. Although all the chickens are put in an electrified cleanse before being throat-slitting, the bath only makes them immobility not fully unconscious. Furthermore, as stated above, there are evidences that chickens completely miss the blade therefore they are still animate when being put in the scalding tank. According to USDA, there are nearly 3 million scalded alive chickens every year.(4) KFC suppliers, KFC and the Natio nal Chicken Council choose standards for stocking density to ensure birds have sufficient space and are wellnessy. The cleanliness of these facilities and the health of the birds are top priorities for the farmers. Unfortunately, KFC suppliers actually do not have good facility to ensure birds have sufficient space and healthy give care they stated. They are famous for fosterage chickens in a small area, as small as assertable so they could cut plenty on cost. The wastes from chickens are not notwithstanding cleaned up during their life time, again just to save cost. The effect of this is create many health problems to chickens. One of the reasons why KFC and its suppliers are so perfunctory is because according to the federal Humane Methods of Slaughter Act, chickens are not protected. Farmed animals such as chickens, cows are also not covered by the Animal Welfare Act either.(4) Ever since the videos are published, many protests and campaigns have been taken place, causing dramatic impact on KFCs stockholders. Activists, by the media, have made people aware of the problem and therefore most people decided to stop eating at KFC a quality of pro test.There was a time KFCs stock went down by 10% because of the scandal and this has made these stockholders, managers become more serious with the problem and come up with some solutions. erstwhile of the few solutions that KFC could put one over to fix the problem is to ask the suppliers to punish those who are responsible for the incidents. This includes the workers who abuse the chickens, the supervisors at these 2 facilities who completely ignored the abuse. The punishment will emphatically set an example for other employees and supervisors at other suppliers facilities. Moreover, they could install more cameras in the slaughterhouses to control workers act. Once a month, private investigators could be hired to make sure animal abuse will not happen again. This seems to be one of the most effective solutions since workers are in tighter control, it is very unlikely that they will violate the rules.KFC, however, has to pay a little extra money each month to maintain the cameras and the cost of hiring private investigators. The reason why workers mistreat the chickens at these suppliers could be because they are not satisfied with their salary. This could be easily explained, firstly, since most of the suppliers will try to cut down cost as much as possible they are likely to reduce the wage rate to exploit workers. Since the demand for this type of job is high, it is workers who need the suppliers, not the other way round so employees will always feel like they are being exploited. Secondly, those farm suppliers are famous for their terrible works conditions, there is always a problem with hygiene and environment in the slaughterhouses. All the factors combined will cause workers to be easily forbid and pass the angry to the chickens.Therefore, the solution is KFC to force sup pliers to improve wage rate and the working conditions. Once these have taken place, the rate of mistreating animals will emphatically be reduced. Although, this solution seems to work in theory, it is unlikely to work in practice since it has too many disadvantages. They must spend a dish more each month to increase the salary for all workers in these suppliers. This might also set a bad habit for workers, treating chickens disadvantageously as a sign of protest to demand higher wages. In response to all the claims by PETA, KFC states on their website that PETA is actually a mathematical group extremist group and their main purpose is to promote a vegetarian health style (3).Because of this, PETA is unbiased and their claims are not totally correct and could be misleading. In addition to this, KFC has also ensured consumers that their chickens are bought from the same suppliers that provide raw meat to supermarkets and restaurants. Although in the real world they have no respon sibility over the animal cruelty and abuse in those slaughterhouses, they did require suppliers to heed the law as well as animal welfare. In conclusion, we can see from the report that both KFC and PETA have different point of views, and they are both reasonable in their ways. However, the situation could have been much get out if KFC took care of the scandal thoroughly as soon as possible so that the same mistake will not happen again in the future.